![]() ![]() ![]() What's more, the differences between some of these frame rates are actually pretty small. In fact, it even pips the 1660 Ti to the post in Forza Horizon 4, claiming 1st place with an average of 106fps compared to just 100fps. The GTX 1660 Ti, meanwhile, is much better equipped for dealing with those higher quality settings.Ĭompared with the GTX 1660 Super, the 1660 Ti is still the faster card overall, but as you can see below, the 1660 Super does come pretty close to hitting 60fps on Ultra settings in a surprisingly high number of cases. That's because the GTX 1660 can still hit 60fps on High settings in pretty much every one of today's big blockbuster games, which is great if you're looking to save a bit of cash. Right now, the GTX 1660 Ti is my top 1080p gaphic card recommendation, while the regular GTX 1660 is the card I reckon 'you should actually buy' if you're less fussed about playing at 60fps on max settings. Nvidia GTX 1660 Super vs 1660 Ti: 1080p benchmarks As a result, they should be fairly representative of their respective families, but you may find more expensive cards achieve ever so slightly faster results than what I've detailed below. Both cards are at the cheaper end of their respective categories, and I left both of them running at their stock reference speeds. The games include Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Metro Exodus, The Witcher III, Final Fantasy XV, Monster Hunter: World and Forza Horizon 4.įor this particular test, I've used Zotac's GeForce GTX 1660 Super Twin Fan and Asus GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Phoenix cards, as these were the ones sent to me for review. ![]() To test each card, I paired them with my Intel Core i5-8600K CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz RAM and put them through my general benchmarking suite, taking an average frame rate from either their own built-in benchmarking tools or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests. As such, I haven’t included any 4K results here. Also like that particular test, I've only focused on 1920x10x1440 resolutions this time round, because, let's face it, these cards are in no way intended to be 4K GPUs. Just like my GTX 1660 vs 1660 Super comparison piece, the main thing I want to find out here is how well each card runs at a variety of resolutions and graphics settings. Nvidia GTX 1660 Super vs 1660 Ti: How we test But given the GTX 1660 was already pretty close in speed to its more expensive cousin, the GTX 1660 Ti, is the GTX 1660 Super actually a way of getting Ti levels of power on the cheap? I've made some lovely bar graphs to find out. It's a teensy bit faster than its non-Super sibling, the regular old GTX 1660, but not quite fast enough to really a proper impact on your minute-to-minute gaming performance. The current base price for the Pavilion is $749, so that would jump to $1,019, which is a 36.1% increase in price.Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1660 Super is in a bit of an odd place right now. When configuring the Pavilion 15, it costs an extra $270 to go from a GTX 1650 to a GTX 1660 Ti. When it comes to VR, the GTX 1660 Ti hit a 9.2 out of 11 on the SteamVR Performance Test, while the GTX 1650 lagged behind at 5.9 (55.9% increase in performance). On the Far Cry New Dawn benchmark (Ultra, 1080p), the GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1650 ran a tight race, at 62 fps and 54 fps, respectively (14.8% increase in performance). In the sequel, the GTX 1660 Ti managed 36 fps on the Metro: Exodus test (Ultra, 1080p), whereas the GTX 1650 was unplayable at 25 fps (44% increase in performance). On the Metro: Last Light benchmark (Ultra, 1080p), the GTX 1660 Ti scored 52 fps, sliding past the GTX 1650, which landed at 37 fps (40.5% increase in performance). The GTX 1660 Ti and the GTX 1650 were still a distance away on the Grand Theft Auto V test (Very High, 1080p), averaging 56 fps and 39 fps, respectively (43.59% increase in performance). Meanwhile, the difference between the GPUs remained consistent on the Hitman benchmark (Ultra, 1080p), as the GTX 1660 Ti nailed 73 fps over the GTX 1650's 57 fps (28.1% increase in performance). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |